The Real Reason the FCC made Woger Retest! 

The Real Reason the FCC made Woger Retest!

It is well known that Roger Wiseman is a habitual liar. This is very easy to prove.
Roger has long maintained that when the FCC made him retake his license exam that it had nothing to do with his behavior. It was a random event according to
Roger and had nothing what so ever to do with his behavior. A look at ARRL logs and a letter from Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement, Riley Hollingsworth I obtained from the FCC (anyone wanting to obtain this letter has only has to write the FCC and ask for it under the freedom of information act), tells a far different story than the lies Woger tells!



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A representative listing of recent reports on Amateur Radio enforcement-related actions from the files of the FCC Enforcement Bureau:
NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC rules. The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the rules to readminister any examination element previously administered by a volunteer examiner. This Enforcement Log is representative of recent Warning Notices, Notices of Violation, calls for retesting, and other FCC communications to licensees involving possible serious rules violations. It is not a comprehensive listing of FCC Amateur enforcement actions.


FREEPORT, OH/GLENDALE, WV: The FCC wrote Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, and General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between the two men that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Last November 9, the FCC sent Wiseman a Warning Notice in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters.
http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement_logs/2000/0410.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters.
http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement_logs/2000/0719.html

-----------------------------------------------------------

May 12, 1999

610 GLEN HAVEN AVE
GLENDALE, WV 26038-1302



Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement,
Riley Hollingsworth
FCC 1270 Fairfield
Road Gettysburg, PA 17325




Dear Mr. Wiseman,


I find it hard to believe your assertion that this incident of jamming on 20 meters is an isolated occurrence. I have too many complaints on my desk about you for this to be a “one time affair.” I have a strong feeling that this time is not the only time you’ve let your emotions get the better of you and acted out in a juvenile manner. My personal opinion is that you have a lot of growing up to do. Generally when this kind of violation occurs I fine a licensee, however since you’ve already stated that you are indigent and can not afford a fine, I will, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2), readminister your licensure exam. Rest assured if your misbehavior continues next time your license will be suspended.



Sincerely Yours,



Riley Hollingsworth.